The Court of BRAINROT

Every piece tried.
Every verdict shapes its burn value.

What the Court decides

Each piece receives one of seven standings. The standing determines the brainpoint yield when a piece is burned.

IMMORTAL
The Court enshrines the piece
150BP
EXEMPLARY
The piece exemplifies the collection
120BP
MEMORABLE
The piece lands
110BP
no standing
The Court noted the piece and moved on
100BP
COOKED
The piece is played-out
115BP
SLOP
The piece is bad
125BP
DEATH SENTENCE
The Court recommends destruction
200BP

Both extremes pay more than the middle. Burning a piece the Court loved is a real sacrifice; burning a piece the Court condemned is rewarded.

A first for an NFT collection

Every piece has been judged by an AI court. Not algorithmically scored — tried. Two AI lawyers argue the case; an AI judge renders the verdict. Forty distinct lawyer characters, twenty judges, ten thousand proceedings.

The transcripts are preserved and viewable. Every piece has its own court record.

How a trial works

An Advocate argues that the piece earns its place. An Adversary argues that it doesn't. A Judge weighs both sides and rules.

Each trial follows three phases: opening arguments, examination, and the ruling. The judge issues a written verdict and assigns the piece a standing.

The court's reasoning is fully transparent. You can read what the lawyers said, what the judge concluded, and why.

Loading sample trial…

Learn more